The thing people miss about #desktop #Linux is: it's not that Linux users are using Linux purely for ideology, in most cases. If I could get everything done on Windows in a similar amount of time with a similar level of satisfaction, I probably would.

But I can't. I can't use a tiling WM. I can't use BTRFS or ZFS for my external storage cluster. I can't have a decent package manager or functioning containerization or a command-line driven workflow.

I can't tune my power saving parameters. I can't have ten workspaces that I switch between easily. I can't use the custom symbol inserter I wrote, which is way faster than any other I've used on _any_ platform.

I can't get my work done as effectively. I also wouldn't enjoy it! Using windows annoys me constantly with little things: the way the start menu works, the way applications lay themselves out on the screen, the way the login screen works, the network preferences and device listing being buried.

Show thread

I don't use Linux due for ideological reasons. I care about free software as an ideology because using Linux, Firefox, and other free software has made my life better.

Show thread

All this to say: don't come after desktop Linux because it doesn't solve your problems as well as other operating systems.

Linux and the free software ecosystem are developed by volunteers. We cannot expect them to be at the same level of support and polish as commercial software products.

I don't "enjoy the kind of computing we had in the mid 2000s". It solves my problems and nothing else does. Please don't condescend to me and people like me and/or assume that things would somehow be easier elsewhere.

Follow

@tindall I am with you 100%. Linux feels like it was made specifically for me. Windows feels like it was made for someone who has a completely different set of needs so far removed from my own that it's almost comical.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Chitter

Chitter is a social network fostering a friendly, inclusive, and incredibly soft community.