Follow

what if instead of 'artificial' intelligence we call them 'superficial' intelligence, because they only give off the appearance of intelligence at this point

@fluttergirly have you had a conversation with gpt-3? That thing is pretty convincing!

@fluttergirly omg yes I am totally stealing this and using it everywhere. (happy to credit, or respect your privacy, whatever is best for you)

@fluttergirly Believe me when I say, we give off the appearance of intelligence- don't have any at all. No life form could be as ignorant or bigger idiots than humans. And they're nasty germy too. Don't touch them
@Sophistifunk @fluttergirly Superficial:
*appearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.
*not thorough, deep, or complete; cursory.
*lacking depth of character or understanding.
--Ecosia

@fluttergirly Superficial intelligence still seems to give these systems too much credit. Maybe artificial guesswork would be more appropriate?

@fluttergirly@chitter.xyz that term would also apply to approximately half the world population

@fluttergirly Superficial is exactly what Americans are. Phony to the core
@Sophistifunk @Moutmout @fluttergirly @lydiaconwell appearing to be true or real only until examined more closely.
not thorough, deep, or complete; cursory.
lacking depth of character or understanding.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Chitter

Chitter is a social network fostering a friendly, inclusive, and incredibly soft community.